by Shu » Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:52 pm
Looks great. That's my favorite part of the build, watching the hull slowly take shape. Appears to have less deadrise in the bow sections than a B5. I think that will help it keep it's bow up. However, coupled with what appears to be less rocker forward, it might be similar to a B5 in that respect. Joe, some of the photos suggest that the stem at the knuckle is fatter than the stem at the chine; maybe almost a suggestion of a bulb? If that is the case, this together with the flatter cross-section at the stern suggest that Paul is trying to maximize the prismatic coefficient (ratio of the displaced volume to volume of a prism the length of the waterline and having a constant cross-section equal to the maximum submerged cross-section of the hull). But then again, I may be seeing something that's not there...
Steve Shumaker
USA 1183